Is this workflow worth automating?
Describe one repetitive business process. Get an initial opportunity score, workflow architecture and a practical recommendation — without a sales call. This is an early beta: results may change and are not a guarantee of savings.
Map one repetitive process, test the AI-assisted flow, define human review and document the handover.
Structure recurring company, market, document or competitor research with source verification.
Test prompts, outputs and knowledge workflows, identify failure modes and improve reliability.
Use normal business language. No technical architecture required.
The scanner separates workload economics, automation potential, complexity and human review.
Stop, test, request a deeper diagnostic, or ask Alpinnovvate to scope a pilot.
Teams with real workflow friction — not AI theatre.
Best fit: Swiss and DACH SMEs, agencies and operational teams dealing with repetitive knowledge work, document-heavy processes or inconsistent first-pass analysis.
Email, document, CRM and back-office workflows where people repeat the same handling steps every week.
Recurring company, market, competitor, policy or document research that needs source verification and structured output.
Teams already using copilots, chatbots or internal AI tools that need output QA, workflow testing and clearer human-review rules.
Start free. Go deeper only when the process deserves it.
The product is deliberately staged so you do not buy implementation before the workflow has a credible business case.
Quick Workflow Scan
A fast go / test / stop decision for one repetitive process.
- —Automation potential score
- —Workload exposure
- —Economic potential
- —Human-review recommendation
- —Suggested workflow architecture
- —PILOT / TEST FIRST / DON'T BUILD YET
Full AI Workflow Diagnostic
A more detailed decision document for teams that need to understand the process before investing.
- —Current-state bottleneck
- —Future workflow design
- —What AI should and should not do
- —Data and system access needs
- —Risk controls
- —Pilot scope, success metrics and acceptance criteria
Scoped Pilot
For workflows that pass the business-value test and are ready to be tested with real inputs.
- —Scope and process boundary
- —Specialist delivery where required
- —Human-review and escalation design
- —Testing and output QA
- —Handover / SOP documentation
- —Pricing only after scope is clear
One process. Eight inputs. One decision.
The scanner separates economics from technical possibility. A workflow can be automatable and still not be worth building.
The scanner does not assume every technically possible automation creates business value. Volume, time, risk and human judgment are separated before a pilot is recommended.
When deeper engineering is required, Alpinnovvate can structure the project and assemble appropriate specialist delivery capacity rather than pretending one profile covers every layer.
Business problem first. AI second.
Workflow discovery, research and document analysis, AI-output QA/evaluation, prompt and workflow testing, project structure, client communication and acceptance criteria.
Alpinnovvate can structure the project and assemble appropriate specialist delivery capacity rather than pretending one profile covers every technical layer.
Start with the scanner if you can. It gives the conversation a concrete process, workload and decision context.
What buyers usually want to know.
Do I need technical AI knowledge?+
No. Describe the process in normal business language: what happens, how often, how long it takes, what information is used and where the pain is.
Does the score guarantee savings or ROI?+
No. The workload arithmetic is based on your submitted volume, time and people inputs. The score is a qualification aid, not a guarantee of savings, technical feasibility or business outcome.
Should I paste real customer files or confidential data?+
No. Use process descriptions and representative categories. Do not paste passwords, API keys, card data, raw confidential customer records or information you are not authorized to share.
What happens after the free scan?+
You can stop, test the idea internally, request a deeper workflow diagnostic, or ask Alpinnovvate to scope a narrow implementation pilot.
What is the difference between the scan and the full diagnostic?+
The free scan is a quick qualification decision. The full diagnostic goes deeper into the current process, future workflow, human controls, data access, risks, pilot scope, success metrics and acceptance criteria.
Who actually builds the solution?+
Alpinnovvate can own discovery, workflow structure, project coordination and output QA. Where deeper engineering is required, the appropriate specialist capacity can be assembled for the scoped project.
Is an implementation proposal a commitment?+
No. An implementation request starts scoping. Price, responsibilities, technical architecture and contractual terms are only defined once the process boundary and requirements are clear.
Clear data use. No hidden promises.
The scanner stores the workflow information you submit and, when you choose to continue, your contact details and source attribution so the diagnostic or implementation request can be handled.
Do not submit passwords, API keys, payment-card data, confidential customer records or information you are not authorized to share. Workflow descriptions and representative categories are usually enough for an initial assessment.
Scanner results and diagnostics are decision-support outputs. They do not guarantee technical feasibility, savings, revenue or regulatory compliance. Any implementation, integration or ongoing service requires a separate scope and commercial agreement.
Data is retained only as reasonably needed for the requested diagnostic, commercial follow-up, service security and applicable legal obligations. Privacy requests can be submitted on our legal and privacy page or sent to Nourmehri@hotmail.com.